So I readjusted it to idle when not touched, and as im riding it I can press on the cable lightly and it accelerates to top speed... so now im a semi safe rider again.
![Razz :P](./images/smilies/icon_razz.gif)
![Image](http://i304.photobucket.com/albums/nn184/Feral_Sparky/Photo0598.jpg)
Moderator: Moderator
SuprasNsprees wrote:i don't even know what to say
be careful , I guess
+2Trafficjamz wrote:SuprasNsprees wrote:i don't even know what to say
be careful , I guess
I agree. that looks very dangerous
....that pletty funny, glegg.....I laugh til pee on leg....swimmingfree wrote:like ww2 japanese Kamikaze pilots screem
bonsai
swimmingfree
I would disagree with that assessment of the situation. This makes Rube Goldfarb contraptions look mechanically sound.Feral_Sparky wrote:Its not staying that way for long and its a far cry to having to use the kill switch just to slow down which I have been having to do for the last week. And I dont have another mode of transport to work in the mean time.
So its either kill switch or this.. and I have alot more control with this then the kill switch.
motormike wrote:Errands become adventures.
So having the bike launch forward every few seconds while I try to ride under top speed due to living in a residential zone is better then having more accurate and controllable speeds with my foot... if something happens with the kill switch, I might not remember to turn it off, if something happens with my foot all I have to do is move my foot and it stops the motor.Bear45-70 wrote:I would disagree with that assessment of the situation. This makes Rube Goldfarb contraptions look mechanically sound.Feral_Sparky wrote:Its not staying that way for long and its a far cry to having to use the kill switch just to slow down which I have been having to do for the last week. And I dont have another mode of transport to work in the mean time.
So its either kill switch or this.. and I have alot more control with this then the kill switch.
You got it all wrong. Either fix it right or don't do something stupid like this. I would suspect if a cop sees you riding like this, you could very well be cited for unsafe vehicle or at least equipment.Feral_Sparky wrote:So having the bike launch forward every few seconds while I try to ride under top speed due to living in a residential zone is better then having more accurate and controllable speeds with my foot... if something happens with the kill switch, I might not remember to turn it off, if something happens with my foot all I have to do is move my foot and it stops the motor.Bear45-70 wrote:I would disagree with that assessment of the situation. This makes Rube Goldfarb contraptions look mechanically sound.Feral_Sparky wrote:Its not staying that way for long and its a far cry to having to use the kill switch just to slow down which I have been having to do for the last week. And I dont have another mode of transport to work in the mean time.
So its either kill switch or this.. and I have alot more control with this then the kill switch.
Not to mention that I have to ride at night, and using the kill switch means I have to turn off my bike at lights and it makes me harder to see. Or risk an accidental rush of power that I cant control and go flying out into the intersection while using the bike, I just keep my foot off the throttle and I just idle there.
So you decide. If you had to either use the kill switch to ride or a more controllable but technically unsafe foot controlled cable, what would you chose?
And if you say walk. Ill let you know that the route I take to work is on a 55mphroad with lights only till the freeway, and thats only 1/3 of the road.
I never said it was safe, but its far better to the alternative that I had been using to ride the bike. If it happens to you while your going to work and back, and you chose the killswitch method, then good luck with that, I prefer to come up with a safer alternative.