eliteguy50 wrote:The trolls who enjoy the banter.KingJeff801 wrote:Trafficjamz wrote: Two people that like to argue are arguing.... let them be.
....... who will win?
Good call....there is no right answer!!!!!!!!........right?
Moderator: Moderator
eliteguy50 wrote:The trolls who enjoy the banter.KingJeff801 wrote:Trafficjamz wrote: Two people that like to argue are arguing.... let them be.
....... who will win?
You have no clue what a troll is.eliteguy50 wrote:The trolls who enjoy the banter.
Yep, you would believe the the guy that knows nothing that is right . * he thinks Penzoil is good oil.KingJeff801 wrote:Good call....there is no right answer!!!!!!!!........right?
Nope.! I just choose to believe what is tried and true and everything else.....maybe good input.......ya think?Bear45-70 wrote:Yep, you would believe the the guy that knows nothing that is right . * he thinks Penzoil is good oil.KingJeff801 wrote:Good call....there is no right answer!!!!!!!!........right?
Tried and true???? Yeah, back 60 or more years ago every thing ran at 25 to 1. So your way of thinking we should still be doing that because it is tried and true. Yeah, there some real sharp thinkin' there alright.KingJeff801 wrote:Nope.! I just choose to believe what is tried and true and everything else.....maybe good input.......ya think?Bear45-70 wrote:Yep, you would believe the the guy that knows nothing that is right . * he thinks Penzoil is good oil.KingJeff801 wrote:Good call....there is no right answer!!!!!!!!........right?
I don't like Penzoil. You just said that no manufacture suggested a TCW3 rated oil for air cooled two strokes. Which is a blunt lie. Links to companies saying the opposite of what you claim were provided.Bear45-70 wrote:Yep, you would believe the the guy that knows nothing that is right . * he thinks Penzoil is good oil.KingJeff801 wrote:Good call....there is no right answer!!!!!!!!........right?
I provided some links. You had two charts and 50 hours of schooling on old, non-synthetic oils.Bear45-70 wrote: So using big letters and yelling makes you right must be your theory. Penzoil is junk oil and if you use it you are asking for a failure. You claim others say it is OK but you provide no proof. Again your belief and Penzoil's crap oil and claim do not make it so. But keep yelling it and the stupid people will believe you. The ones with a brain will look at the charts I provided and see that you are full of s***.
I believe bear has a lot more experience with synthetic oils then you think if you look back on the posts i believe oil company's came to him with that stuff first came out when he was racing boats (bear correct me if im wrong)Spreetard wrote:You had two charts and 50 hours of schooling on old, non-synthetic oils.
Actually synthetic oil was created in the early 1950s for jet engines. The heat in jet engine totally broken down the dino oil so fast that if the flight was over a couple of hours the engine could be ruined. So synthetic oil came to be, to allow longer flights. Then Amsoil came to be from that beginning. In the 80s Amsoil was pushing to have their 2 stroke oil to be accepted. They sponsored a buddy of mine's race boat. There were some expensive issues that were cured by using the same 18 to 1 to 24 to 1 ratios the dino oil was used at.fastplastic wrote:I believe bear has a lot more experience with synthetic oils then you think if you look back on the posts i believe oil company's came to him with that stuff first came out when he was racing boats (bear correct me if im wrong)Spreetard wrote:You had two charts and 50 hours of schooling on old, non-synthetic oils.
Really bear? It is called sarcasm.Bear45-70 wrote:You have no clue what a troll is.eliteguy50 wrote:The trolls who enjoy the banter.
motormike wrote:Errands become adventures.
You seem to be unaware that on the internet one has to take words at their face value unless the writer indicates that it is funny, a retort, sarcasm, etc. This is done by using the emoticons that are provided for you free of charge next to the message panel.eliteguy50 wrote:Really bear? It is called sarcasm.Bear45-70 wrote:You have no clue what a troll is.eliteguy50 wrote:The trolls who enjoy the banter.
motormike wrote:Errands become adventures.
And again, Bear puts words in my mouth. I never said that TCW3 was junk, you blind old fool. Learn to read.Bear45-70 wrote: I myself used Mercury Marine's blended oil and their synthetic oil in my race motors. So Spreetard is wrong again. The 50 hours was just the oil stuff, I had over 500 hours of 2 stroke schools under my belt.
On his claim that TCW oil is junk, he obviously has no clue what it take to just get a NMMA TCW rating. The test is the actual running of a soeced test engine with the oil. You either past the rigorous test of your oil gets no certification. So junk is an inaccurate description. A TCW-II or 3 rating is even harder to get because the standard is higher than just a TCW rating.