Truck VS Bank
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:41 am
Honda Spree and Elite 50 Forums
Keeping Spree Elite Aero 50cc and Gyro Alive!
http://www.hondaspree.net/phpBB3/
Truck VS Bank
Page 1 of 2
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:43 am
holy sh*t dude!!
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 2:45 am
I don't know if i should laugh or not. Looked like the person in the truck got f'd up. Must of been that cummins power lol.
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:39 am
Darwin Award?
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:56 am
dang dude that guy is probley hurting right now.
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 11:45 pm
I saw that video on CNN the day it happened. There was a guy and his kid in the truck, report stated they got out with only bumps and bruises.
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 1:08 am
Ok, so its safe to laugh... hahahahaha.
Posted: Wed Sep 03, 2008 11:28 am
This happened just a few miles from me. The falling building just clipped the edge of the truck.
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/awning.asp
http://www.snopes.com/photos/accident/awning.asp
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:25 am
i would of been so * a new dodge ram gone
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:34 am
The only person the driver should be * at is himself for felony stupid for not knowing how tall his rig was.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 7:17 am
Since he was trying to drive around the building I would say he knew how tall it was, he just didn't know how WIDE it was.Bear45-70 wrote:The only person the driver should be * at is himself for felony stupid for not knowing how tall his rig was.
From what I understand the company that built the bank is being looked at for a law suit considering how easy it was to knock the drive through over.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 11:07 am
I'm sure the guy's thinking is "Since I'm to dumb to drive around a structure, I"ll sue someone because I couldn't possibly be at fault." It's one of the major problems with our society today. No one tells anyone they were stupid because it might hurt their feels.GIJoeBob wrote:Since he was trying to drive around the building I would say he knew how tall it was, he just didn't know how WIDE it was.Bear45-70 wrote:The only person the driver should be * at is himself for felony stupid for not knowing how tall his rig was.
From what I understand the company that built the bank is being looked at for a law suit considering how easy it was to knock the drive through over.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:04 pm
The driver is not suing the builder, the bank is.Bear45-70 wrote:I'm sure the guy's thinking is "Since I'm to dumb to drive around a structure, I"ll sue someone because I couldn't possibly be at fault." It's one of the major problems with our society today. No one tells anyone they were stupid because it might hurt their feels.GIJoeBob wrote:Since he was trying to drive around the building I would say he knew how tall it was, he just didn't know how WIDE it was.Bear45-70 wrote:The only person the driver should be * at is himself for felony stupid for not knowing how tall his rig was.
From what I understand the company that built the bank is being looked at for a law suit considering how easy it was to knock the drive through over.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 1:07 pm
Why the * would the bank care? Either his insurance or their's paid for the replacement.GIJoeBob wrote:The driver is not suing the builder, the bank is.Bear45-70 wrote:I'm sure the guy's thinking is "Since I'm to dumb to drive around a structure, I"ll sue someone because I couldn't possibly be at fault." It's one of the major problems with our society today. No one tells anyone they were stupid because it might hurt their feels.GIJoeBob wrote: Since he was trying to drive around the building I would say he knew how tall it was, he just didn't know how WIDE it was.
From what I understand the company that built the bank is being looked at for a law suit considering how easy it was to knock the drive through over.
Posted: Thu Sep 04, 2008 3:59 pm
Because they didn't get their money's worth in the first place with a building that was not up to code.Bear45-70 wrote:Why the * would the bank care? Either his insurance or their's paid for the replacement.GIJoeBob wrote:The driver is not suing the builder, the bank is.Bear45-70 wrote: I'm sure the guy's thinking is "Since I'm to dumb to drive around a structure, I"ll sue someone because I couldn't possibly be at fault." It's one of the major problems with our society today. No one tells anyone they were stupid because it might hurt their feels.